AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PETER MULLER et al., Respondents, v. WARING ABBOTT, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to award him relief under Civil Rights Law § 70-a (1), assuming that the action was properly characterized as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation ( see Matter of West Branch Conservation Assn. v. Planning Bd. of Town of Clarkstown, 222 AD2d 513).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MULLER v. ABBOTT
(Jan 24, 2006)