AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of MIKAL AMEEN, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon after a nail six inches in length and taped at one end was found in his locker. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence, consisting of the misbehavior report, hearing testimony and documentary evidence, supports the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Vines v. Goord, 19 AD3d 951, 952; Matter of Sanchez v. Goord, 300 AD2d 956). The fact that the weapon was found in an area under petitioner's control supports the inference that it belonged to him ( see Matter of Charles v. Selsky, 13 AD3d 861, 862; Matter of Cummings v. Goord, 10 AD3d 748, 749). Petitioner's claim that the weapon had been planted by other inmates presented a credibility issue for the hearing officer to resolve ( see Matter of Alston v. Goord, 4 AD3d 708, 709).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF AMEEN v. SELSKY
(Jan 26, 2006)