AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of ALEKSANDER KEYLIKHES, Respondent, v. ELENA KIEJLICHES, Also Known as HELENA KIEJLICHES, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has broad discretion in making determinations concerning matters such as visitation, and such determinations should not be disturbed unless they lack a sound basis in the record ( see Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 174; Matter of Rho v. Rho, 19 AD3d 605). Contrary to the mother's contention, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the Family Court's determination, inter alia, that visitation was not in the children's best interests ( see Matter of Taylor v. Lumba, 309 AD2d 941, 942; Matter of Wissink v. Wissink, 301 AD2d 36, 39; Matter of Castellano v. England, 275 AD2d 412, 413; Young v. Young, 212 AD2d 114, 118).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF KEYLIKHES v. KIEJLICHES
(Jan 31, 2006)