Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 04-05-00353-CR See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. Robert SUTTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION Opinion by: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice. This is an appeal from the trial court's order revoking defendant, Robert Sutton's community supervision. Defendant's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Defendant was informed of his right to review the record. Counsel provided defendant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a pro se brief. Defendant has not filed a brief. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.).