AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

OPAL A. HINES, Plaintiff, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP., Defendant.

RICHARD YOUNG, District Judge

Parties appear for the final pre-trial conference. Plaintiff, Opal A. Hines, appears by Steven T. Fulk; Defendant, DaimlerChrysler Corp., appears by R. Anthony Prather and Shannon M. Shaw. The court heard brief argument regarding a number of pending motions, and the court ruled on the same, memorialized below as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine.

a. Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude any finding, supposed finding, or inability to make a finding by the EEOC is GRANTED;
b. Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude any evidence of the court's dismissal with prejudice of the Plaintiff's complaint of sex discrimination is GRANTED.

2. Defendant's Motion in Limine

a. Defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence of Plaintiff's claim of sex discrimination is GRANTED;
b. Defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence and argument concerning punitive damages is UNDER ADVISEMENT;
c. Defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence or testimony from expert witnesses who may be called by Plaintiff is GRANTED;
d. Defendant's motion in limine to exclude any testimony, exhibits, or references to Defendant's EEOC position statements is GRANTED;
e. Defendant's motion in limine to exclude Defendant's financial information (for purposes of Plaintiff's punitive damages claim) is UNDER ADVISEMENT;
f. Defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence relating to the size of the law firm representing Defendant is GRANTED.
3. Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate Damages from Liability is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant's motion is GRANTED with respect to any equitable damages Plaintiff may seek, and DENIED with respect to compensatory damages.
4. Defendant's Motion for Separation of Witnesses is GRANTED.
5. Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's List of Witnesses Expected to Testify at Trial.
Plaintiff's objection to DaimlerChrysler representative, Cindy Pronger, named as a witness is OVERRULED.
6. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's exhibits 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 is DENIED as MOOT, as the court granted Plaintiff leave to supplement her witness list to include Matt Ryan.
7. Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's exhibits 13 and 14 is SUSTAINED. Plaintiff and Defendant will agree to the necessary redactions within the next week.

In other matters, the court discussed its voir dire process, and ordered the parties to file a joint Statement of the Case by Friday, February 24, 2006. The trial is expected to last three days.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HINES v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP
(Feb 1, 2006)