AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

The ESTATE OF JOHN LEE, by and through Suzanne Lee, Personal Representati v. , Plaintiff,

ORDER STAYING DEADLINES AND DISCOVERY

STEPHAN MICKLE, District Judge

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the request of all parties to stay deadlines and discovery in the case until certain motions have been disposed of. While the parties have differing reasons for requesting a stay, the Court finds the request to be an appropriate one.

No particular document number is referenced because the requests are embodied in other motions, such as Plaintiff's motion for remand and for protective order (doc. 11) and Defendants' motion to strike discovery (doc. 5).

Plaintiff requests a stay until her pending motion to remand (doc. 11) is ruled upon. Defendants request a stay until their pending motion to compel arbitration (doc. 4) is decided. The Court must first determine whether it possesses subject-matter jurisdiction before proceeding further; thus, until that issue is resolved, all other pending matters should be stayed.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Defendants shall file a response to the motion to remand (doc. 11) on or before February 7, 2006.
2. All discovery and response deadlines are hereby stayed until rendition of an order on the motion to remand.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ESTATE OF LEE v. CENTRE POINTE HRC, LLC (N.D.Fla. 2006)
(Feb 1, 2006)