AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of PATRICK HAYES, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Ser

During a monitored telephone conversation, petitioner instructed his wife to bring drugs into the correctional facility during a planned visit and also had her make a three-way call. When petitioner's wife was confronted by correction officials during her visit, she voluntarily surrendered two balloons that she had concealed in her genital area and was arrested on various charges. The contents of the balloons tested positive for cocaine and marihuana. Petitioner was subsequently charged in a misbehavior report with conspiring to introduce drugs into the facility, smuggling and making a third-party telephone call. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the transcript of the monitored telephone conversation and documentary evidence, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Cooper v. Selsky, 9 AD3d 763, 764; Matter of Taylor v. Poole, 297 AD2d 866, 866). Petitioner's assertion that he had nothing to do with smuggling drugs into the facility presented a credibility issue for the hearing officer to resolve ( see Matter of Gee v. Goord, 21 AD3d 636, 637). Moreover, while petitioner objected to the Deputy Superintendent acting as the hearing officer, the Deputy Superintendent explained that he was not involved in the investigation and that his only knowledge of the incident was that a visitor had been arrested. We reject petitioner's argument that the hearing officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias ( see Matter of Harris v. Selsky, 15 AD3d 708, 709). Petitioner's remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF HAYES v. GOORD
(Feb 2, 2006)