Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

COREY BARNES, Petitioner, v. RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, Secretary, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE AS DUPLICATIVE

IRMA GONZALEZ, District Judge

The Court may dismiss a duplicative petition as frivolous if it "merely repeats pending or previously litigated claims." Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1995) (citations omitted). Here, Petitioner has filed two identical petitions with this Court. On December 12, 2005, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which was given case number 05cv2258 W (JMA). Petitioner filed a second Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on January 4, 2006. which was given case number 06cv0019 IEG (POR). The petition in this case repeats the claims that are pending in case number 05cv2258 W (JMA). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this case because the Petition in this case is duplicative of that filed in case number 06cv0019 IEG (POR). In addition, the briefing schedule set forth in the Order to Respond issued in this case on January 27, 2006 is hereby VACATED. The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARNES v. HICKMAN
(Feb 3, 2006)