AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMON JON, Appellant.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility ( see People v. Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94).

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's CPL 440.10 motion without a hearing ( see CPL 440.30 [a], [b]). Although defendant claimed that his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance by failing to call a particular witness, defendant's moving papers gave no indication of the substance of the potential witness's testimony ( see People v. Session, 34 NY2d 254).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JON
(Feb 16, 2006)