The court's finding as to sexual abuse and forcible touching was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility. The sexual gratification element could be readily inferred from appellant's conduct, which included rubbing his clothed penis against the victim's buttocks while attempting to pull down the victim's pants ( see e.g., Matter of Stephen F., 300 AD2d 52; Matter of Joel H., 279 AD2d 266). The court properly rejected appellant's claim that the incident was merely a playful wrestling match.
As the presentment agency concedes, appellant is entitled to dismissal of the unlawful imprisonment count based upon the merger doctrine.