Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

MICHAEL DEE JAMISON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN MILLER, Respondent.

ORDER

ROBIN CAUTHRON, Chief District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge on January 18, 2006. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed; however, on January 31, 2006, Petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee, rendering the Magistrate Judge's recommendation moot.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted in part. The claim is dismissed as against the Attorney General' Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied; but because the filing fee has now been paid, the case is once again committed to the Magistrate Judge under the initial Order of Referral.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JAMISON v. MILLER
(Feb 27, 2006)