AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SHAMAR DOCKERY et al., Respondents, v. BUDGET RENT-A-CAR et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Mark Anthony Guniss did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 NY2d 955; Aronov v. Leybovich, 3 AD3d 511, 512). Consequently, the burden never shifted to the plaintiff Mark Anthony Guniss to raise a triable issue of fact, and we need not consider the sufficiency of his opposition to the motion ( see Facci v. Kaminsky, 18 AD3d 806, 807; Rich-Wing v. Baboolal, 18 AD3d 726, 727; Hanna v. Alverado, 16 AD3d 624; Mariaca-Olmos v. Mizrhy, 226 AD2d 437).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOCKERY v. BUDGET RENT-A-CAR
(Mar 7, 2006)