AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARCUS DAIRY, INC., Respondent, v. JACENE REALTY CORP. et al., Defendants, and COLUMBIA EQUITIES, LTD., Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to the doctrine of law of the case, judicial determinations made during the course of a litigation before final judgment is entered may have preclusive effect provided that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the initial determination ( see Purpura v. Purpura, 21 AD3d 542; Stone v. Stone, 19 AD3d 404; Engel v. Eichler, 300 AD2d 622, 623). The issues raised by the appellant on this appeal are the same as those raised by it and addressed by this Court on a prior appeal ( see Marcus Dairy v. Jacene Realty Corp., 298 AD2d 366). Since the appellant had a full and fair opportunity to litigate these issues, it is precluded from relitigating them.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARCUS DAIRY, INC. v. JACENE REALTY CORP
(Mar 7, 2006)