Ordered that the order of disposition dated November 30, 2004 is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly accepted the appellant's admission to the allegations of the violation of probation petition against him ( see Family Ct Act § 360.3, [2]; § 321.3 [1]; Matter of Ricky A., 11 AD3d 532; see also Matter of Edwin L., 88 NY2d 593; Matter of Louis W., 282 AD2d 686).
The disposition of two years of probation, effective November 22, 2004, was also proper. Family Court Act § 360.3 (6) provides that at the conclusion of a hearing on a violation petition, the court has the option of revoking, continuing, or modifying the order of disposition imposing a term of probation, and is only required to order a "different disposition" if it revokes probation. Accordingly, the Family Court was authorized to modify the original order of disposition imposing probation by extending its terms ( see Matter of Robert J., 2 NY3d 339, 346).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.