Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

HEIKKILA v. NORTH STAR TRUCKING, INC.

Summary Dispositions.

SC: 127780, 127823, 127836, COA: 246761.

The motion to disqualify is denied. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse, in part, the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate summary disposition for appellant North Star Steel Company for the reasons stated in part II of Court of Appeals Judge KELLY'S concurrence and dissent. MCR 7.302(G)(1).

CAVANAGH, J. I would deny leave to appeal.

WEAVER, J. I would deny leave to appeal. I do not participate in deciding plaintiff's motion to disqualify Chief Justice TAYLOR and Justices CORRIGAN, YOUNG, and MARKMAN. This Court should publish proposals for public comment, place the issue on a public hearing for administrative matters, resolve, and make clear for all to know the proper procedures for handling motions for the recusal of Supreme Court justices from participation in a case. See Scalise v. Boy Scouts of America, 473 Mich 853 (2005). This Court opened an administrative file on the question on May 20, 2003, but has yet to address the matter. See ADM 2003-26.

The question regarding the participation or nonparticipation of justices frequently recurs and is a matter of public significance because even one justice's decision to participate or not participate may affect the decision and outcome in a case. See Advocacy Org for Patients Providers v. Auto Club Ins Ass'n, 472 Mich 91, 96-104 (2005) (WEAVER, J., concurring).

KELLY, J. I would deny leave to appeal. I do not participate in the decision to deny the motion to disqualify. I agree with Justice WEAVER in urging the Court to establish a particularized procedure to handle motions to disqualify a Supreme Court justice from participation in a case.

CORRIGAN, J. I would peremptorily reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate summary disposition in favor of appellants, for the reasons stated in Court of Appeals Judge KELLY's concurrence and dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEIKKILA v. NORTH STAR TRUCKING, INC
(Mar 10, 2006)