Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

FRED VAN SICKLE, District Judge

JUDGMENT HAVING been entered against Timothy Williams in Asotin County (Washington) Superior Court on or about May 19, 2003; Mr. Williams' conviction having become final before the Supreme Court decided Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004); and the Ninth Circuit having decided that Blakely does not apply retroactively to a conviction that became final before that case was decided, Schardt v. Payne, 414 F.3d 1025, 1038 (9th Cir. 2005); Now, therefore

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Magistrate Judge Michael W. Leavitt correctly determined that Mr. Williams may not challenge the validity of his conviction under Blakely v. Washington, supra.

2. Mr. Williams' objections (Ct. Rec. 7) are overruled.

3. The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Leavitt's report and recommendation (Ct. Rec. 6).

4. Mr. Williams' amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Ct. Rec. 5) is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to file this order, enter judgment accordingly, furnish copies of the order and judgment to Mr. Williams, and close the case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMS v. MILLER-STOUT
(Mar 10, 2006)