AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE INVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

MARTIN JENKINS, District Judge

This Stipulation is entered into by and among lead plaintiffs, The Glazer Funds ("Plaintiffs") and defendants InVision Technologies, Inc. ("InVision"), Sergio Magistri and Ross Mulholland (collectively, "Defendants") by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint on February 22, 2006;

WHEREAS, the parties have customarily set a briefing schedule for motions in this matter, subject to the Court's availability;

WHEREAS this schedule will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1(a), that:

(1) Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Consolidated Complaint shall be filed on or before March 27, 2006;
(2) Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before May 1, 2006;
(3) Defendants' reply in support of their motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before May 22, 2006; and
(4) The hearing on Defendants' motion to dismiss shall be on June 6, 2006, or such other date as the Court may find convenient.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE INVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION (N.D.Cal. 2006)
(Mar 13, 2006)