Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

LISA A. VANEK, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. STEPHEN J. VANEK, Petitioner Below, Appellee.

ORDER

JACK B. JACOBS.

This 27th day of March 2006, it appears to the Court that, on January 12, 2006, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to diligently prosecute her appeal by not filing the opening brief and appendix in this matter. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VANEK v. VANEK
(Mar 27, 2006)