AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of FRANK MARZIGLIANO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (NYCERS), Respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding in light of the narrow standard of review defined by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. ( 88 NY2d 756, 760-761; see Matter of Ackalitis v. Murphy, 5 AD3d 381, 382; Matter of Drew v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 305 AD2d 408, 409; Matter of Inguanta v. Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 302 AD2d 527; Matter of Simmons v. New York City Tr. Auth., 250 AD2d 856, 857; Matter of Baer v. New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 114 AD2d 556, 557).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF MARZIGLIANO
(Mar 28, 2006)