AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

NESCO, INC., f/k/a NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CO., INC., acting by and through its successors NESCO LIQUIDATION TRUST and LINC ACQUISITION ONE, LLC., Plaintiff, v. FAIRLEY CISCO, ALETHA CISCO MOORE, BRITT CLINTON MOORE, CISCO TRAVEL PLAZA, INC., CISCO EXPRESS, INC., and GOWEN OIL CO., INC., Defendants.

ORDER

JAMES GRAHAM, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and Production of Documents. Plaintiff seeks an order directing Fairley Cisco, Aletha Cisco Moore, Britt Clinton Moore, Cisco Travel Plaza, Inc., and Cisco Express, Inc., ("the Cisco Defendants") to respond to discovery related to certain issues in this case. Plaintiff also seeks an award of attorneys' fees and costs for bringing this motion. The Cisco Defendants filed a response, and on March 23, 2006, the undersigned conducted a hearing. In a letter dated March 31, 2006, the Cisco Defendants advised the Court that the parties have resolved all of the issues raised in Plaintiff's Motion to Compel with the exception of Requests for Production numbered 10, 14, 20, and 25.

After consideration, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel with regard to Requests for Production numbered 10, 14, 20, and 25, is DENIED, as said requests are overly broad and unduly burdensome. Said Defendants have no obligation to produce the documents requested therein. Plaintiff's request for an award of attorneys' fees and costs is also denied. SO ORDERED,

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NESCO, INC. v. CISCO (S.D.Ga. 2006)
(Apr 13, 2006)