Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Smart Summary

Case Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The opinion concerns Betsey H. McKeon, executrix, v. Whitney Plaza Trust, with Schindler Elevator Corporation as a third-party defendant, before the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on May 1, 2006. The matter is an appeal from a reported decision below: 65 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 (2006). The opinion states that further appellate review was denied and that MME. Justice Cowin did not participate. No factual background or substantive procedural history is included in the provided text.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The document provided is a procedural order denying further appellate review. No substantive legal analysis or explanation of the court's reasoning is included in the text.

Holding and Implications

Further appellate review denied.

Implications: The denial ends further appellate review by this court. The opinion contains no discussion of broader legal implications and does not establish new precedent.

BETSEY H. MCKEON, executrix, v. WHITNEY PLAZA TRUST; SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, third-party defendant.

Further appellate review denied:

MME. JUSTICE COWIN did not participate.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MCKEON v. WHITNEY PLAZA TRUST
(May 1, 2006)