AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of SAMANTHA D., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in restoring the juvenile delinquency proceeding and in declining to dismiss the underlying petition pursuant to the previously-ordered adjournment in contemplation of dismissal ( see Family Ct Act § 353.1). After a proper inquiry ( see Matter of Edwin L., 88 NY2d 593, 602-603), the Family Court determined that the appellant violated the conditions stated in that prior adjournment in contemplation of dismissal by, among other things, failing to attend school on a regular basis ( see Matter of Jamel A., 19 AD3d 689; Matter of Nikita P., 3 AD3d 499, 501).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF SAMANTHA D
(May 2, 2006)