Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

JOVAN CHANDRE PAYNE, Petitioner, v. THOMAS E. JACKSON, Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

PATRICK DUGGAN, District Judge

Plaintiff Jovan Chandre Payne filed a pro se civil rights complaint on March 10, 2006. Plaintiff, who is a state prisoner, failed to pay the $250 filing fee for a civil action or apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the manner required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The Court, therefore, issued an Order to Correct Deficiency ("Deficiency Order"), on March 13, 2006. The Deficiency Order required Plaintiff to submit the $250.00 filing fee or file the documents required under Section 1915(a) (i.e., an Application for Prisoner to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, Certification Regarding Trust Fund Account, a current Certification/Business Manager's Account Statement, and a statement of Trust Fund Account activity (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint). The Deficiency Order notified Plaintiff that if he failed to pay the filing fee or submit the requested information within thirty days from the date of the Order, the complaint would be dismissed.

Effective April 9, 2006, the filing fee for a civil action was increased to $350.00. Plaintiff filed his complaint prior to April 9, 2006. Consequently, the $250.00 filing fee applied to his action.

The time for submitting the required information has elapsed and Plaintiff has failed to correct the deficiency. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PAYNE v. JACKSON
(May 1, 2006)