AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANTHONY MASTELLONE et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Anthony Mastellone allegedly was injured when he tripped and fell over the legs of a coat rack in a passageway at the defendant's premises. The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint by submitting evidence demonstrating that the coat rack was an open and obvious condition and was not inherently dangerous ( see Webber v. Miller, 17 AD3d 352; Plis v. North Bay Cadillac, 5 AD3d 578; Cupo v. Karfunkel, 1 AD3d 48). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to present evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Jang Hee Lee v. Sung Whun Oh, 3 AD3d 473). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MASTELLONE v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(May 2, 2006)