AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

DEFOREST SEAFOOD, INC. and LAWRENCE ROBSTOCK, Plaintiffs, v. MILFORD BOAT WORKS, INC., Defendant.

ORDER

WARREN EGINTON, Senior District Judge

By motion dated March 6, 2006, the defendant moved for partial summary judgment as to Count IV of the plaintiffs' amended complaint and to strike the plaintiffs' demand for relief. The plaintiffs have not responded to the defendant's motion.

Pursuant to Local Rule 7(a), "all memoranda in opposition to any motion shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the motion." To date, the plaintiffs have neither responded to the defendant's motion nor sought an extension of time within which to do so.

Additionally, in order to grant an unopposed motion for summary judgment, the moving party must present undisputed facts that show that it is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.Giannullo v. City of New York, 322 F.3d 139, 140 (2d Cir. 2003).

The Court finds that the defendant has presented undisputed facts that support their unopposed motions for partial summary judgment and to strike. The Court GRANTS the defendant's motions [Doc. # 38].

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DEFOREST SEAFOOD, INC. v. MILFORD BOAT WORKS, INC. (D.Conn. 2006)
(May 4, 2006)