AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL CHILDS, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, vacating the sentences imposed thereon, and dismissing those counts of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention on appeal, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds pursuant to CPL 30.30. The defendant is correct to the extent that he argues that the People should have been charged with an additional eight days of delay for the period from March 19, 2003 to March 26, 2003 ( see People v. Hall, 213 AD2d 558). However, even counting these additional days, the total time chargeable to the People was still less than six months ( see CPL 30.30 [a]). Thus, the defendant's motion was properly denied.

However, the defendant is correct that his convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree must be vacated. The People did not demonstrate either a complete chain of custody for the evidence giving rise to those counts, or circumstances providing reasonable assurances as to the identity and unchanged condition of the evidence ( see People v. Julian, 41 NY2d 340, 341; People v. Montoya, 244 AD2d 510; People v. Espino, 208 AD2d 556).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CHILDS
(May 9, 2006)