Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

JOHN WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIPS COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD., et al., Defendants.

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

JOHN O'MEARA, District Judge

On April 7, 2006, Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging six counts against Defendants: Count I, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; Count II, violations of the Michigan Occupational Code; Count III, Michigan Debt Collection Practices Act; Count IV, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; Count V, violations of the Michigan Occupational Code; and Count VI, Michigan Debt Collection Practices Act. Plaintiff does not allege that diversity jurisdiction exists. Although Counts I and IV are cognizable in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the remaining allegations present claims based on state law. This court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims so as to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counts II, III, V, and VI of Plaintiff's complaint are DISMISSED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WRIGHT v. PHILLIPS COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD. (E.D.Mich. 2006)
(May 11, 2006)