Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JAMES WALTERS, Plaintiff, v. DHL EXPRESS, Defendant.

ORDER

JOE McDADE, Chief Judge

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Cudmore's Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 9], which addresses Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 4]. The parties have not filed any objections within the ten (10) days allotted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to object constitutes a waiver of any objections. See Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999);Video Views Inc. v. Studio 21 Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 4] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's motion is denied as to Count I of the Complaint, but is granted to the extent it seeks dismissal of Plaintiff's claim for damages for an increased risk of future identity theft in Count II.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WALTERS v. DHL EXPRESS
(May 12, 2006)