AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEETRANAUTH UMADAT, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The factual findings and credibility determinations of a hearing court are accorded great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record ( see People v. Cameron, 6 AD3d 546). Here, nothing in the record supports the defendant's contention that the testimony of the arresting detective at the hearing was incredible or patently tailored to nullify constitutional objections ( see People v. James, 19 AD3d 617, 618; People v. Natiello, 294 AD2d 451; People v. Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. UMADAT
(May 16, 2006)