Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George WELLS, Appellant.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George Wells ("Defendant") appeals from a judgment after a jury found him guilty of one count of second-degree murder in violation of Section 565.02, two counts of armed criminal action ("ACA") in violation of Section 571.015 and one count of attempted armed robbery in violation of Section 564.011. Defendant raises one point on appeal. He argues that the trial court erred and abused its discretion and prejudiced Defendant by allowing witness testimony that contained inadmissible hearsay.

All statutory references are to RSMo. 2004, unless otherwise indicated.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. WELLS
(May 23, 2006)