AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DOROTHY M. DISANTO, Respondent, v. FRANK J. DISANTO, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Absent a legal disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, a trial judge is the sole arbiter of his or her recusal. Since the husband failed to demonstrate that any of the Supreme Court's determinations in the case were the result of bias, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying his motion for recusal ( see York v. York, 250 AD2d 837, 838; Skripek v. Skripek, 239 AD2d 488; Anjam v. Anjam, 191 AD2d 531, 532-533).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DISANTO v. DISANTO
(May 30, 2006)