Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

CALVIN CAMPS v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, MS PIERCE, et al.

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT KELLY, Senior District Judge

Plaintiff, an inmate, is seeking to bring a pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action without prepayment of fees. He alleges that he was injured by Correctional Officer Pierce. He further alleges that he was given a "write up" by the defendants to cover up the facts of his injuries. He states that he received medical treatment for his injuries.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), a prisoner who on three or more prior occasions while incarcerated has filed an action in a federal court that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, must be denied in forma pauperis status unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time that the complaint is filed. Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307 (3d Cir.),cert. denied, 533 U.S. 953 (2001).

Plaintiff has, prior to the instant action, filed four civil actions in a federal court which were dismissed as frivolous.

The four civil actions filed by plaintiff were as follows: 1) Civil Action No. 95-2603 was dismissed as frivolous by Order of this Court filed May 8, 1995; 2) Civil Action No. 91-5807 was dismissed as frivolous by Order of this Court filed September 17, 1991; 3) Civil Action No. 91-5765 was dismissed as frivolous by Order of this Court filed September 16, 1991, and 4) Civil Action No. 90-7617 was dismissed as frivolous by Order of this Court filed December 14, 1990.

Furthermore, nothing in this complaint suggests that plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied.

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of May, 2006, in accordance with the accompanying memorandum, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CAMPS v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
(Jun 1, 2006)