Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RASHEEN NEWKIRK, Defendant.

ORDER

RICHARD ARCARA, District Judge

Defendant Rasheen Newkirk's conviction was entered on May 22, 2002. On June 7, 2002, he filed a Notice of Appeal, one day after the expiration of the ten-day period for filing a Notice of Appeal, see Fed.R.App.P. 4(b)(1)(A), 4(b)(6), 26(a), but within the thirty-day period for requesting an extension for late filing, see Fed.R.App.P. 4(b)(4). On June 1, 2006, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed defendant's untimely appeal without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and directed this Court to treat defendant's late Notice of Appeal as a Rule 4(b)(4) request for an extension to file his Notice of Appeal and to rule on that motion expeditiously.

The Court hereby grants defendant's motion for an extension. Defendant's Notice of Appeal is effective nunc pro tunc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. NEWKIRK
(Jun 1, 2006)