Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A property owner will be held liable for a slip-and-fall involving snow and ice on its property only when it created the dangerous condition that caused the accident or had actual or constructive notice thereof ( see Fahey v. Serota, 23 AD3d 335; Zabbia v. Westwood, LLC, 18 AD3d 542; Cody v. DiLorenzo, 304 AD2d 705; Voss v. DC Parking, 299 AD2d 346; see also Simmons v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972).
In opposition to the defendant's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to establish that the defendant either created the complained-of condition, or had actual or constructive notice thereof. The plaintiff's contention that the defendant failed to provide proper snow and ice control and removal was speculative and insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Carminati v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr., 6 AD3d 481; Carricato v. Jefferson Val. Mall Ltd. Partnership, 299 AD2d 444; see generally Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320).