Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).
The defendant argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a second felony offender. The defendant, however, failed to preserve this claim for appellate review since he did not contest or controvert his status as a second felony offender when he had the opportunity to do so at the sentencing hearing ( see People v. Hamilton, 205 AD2d 706; People v. Khatib, 166 AD2d 668; see also People v. Smith, 73 NY2d 961).
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's contention raised in point three of his brief is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. The defendant's remaining contention raised in point one of his brief is without merit.