ARNETTE et al. v. FORD et al., TRUSTEES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

11586

Attorney(S)

Mr. Joe P. Lane, for appellants, cites: Act March 24, 1924, unconstitutional: 1 Civ. Code 1912, Sec. 2716-2738; 59 S.C. 110; 61 S.C. 211. Mr. W.C. Moore, for respondents, cites: Act should be construed as valid if possible: 12 C.J., 787-8; 84 S.C. 552; 82 S.C. 352; 12 C.J., 791, 799, 703. Consolidation of School districts permissible: 118 S.E., 779.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

11586

Attorney(S)

Mr. Joe P. Lane, for appellants, cites: Act March 24, 1924, unconstitutional: 1 Civ. Code 1912, Sec. 2716-2738; 59 S.C. 110; 61 S.C. 211. Mr. W.C. Moore, for respondents, cites: Act should be construed as valid if possible: 12 C.J., 787-8; 84 S.C. 552; 82 S.C. 352; 12 C.J., 791, 799, 703. Consolidation of School districts permissible: 118 S.E., 779.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

ARNETTE ET AL. v. FORD ET AL., TRUSTEES LAKE VIEW, ETC., SCHOOL.

October 25, 1924. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR JUSTICE WATTS.

For the reasons assigned by his Honor, Judge Featherstone, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES FRASER, COTHRAN and MARION, concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY did not participate.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.