Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The form signed by the defendant, which purported to constitute a waiver of his right to appeal, was insufficient to establish that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal from his sentence on the ground of excessiveness ( see People v. Brown, 13 AD3d 548, 549; People v. Rose, 236 AD2d 637; People v. Rolon, 220 AD2d 543). Accordingly, we have considered the defendant's contention that the sentence was excessive but find it to be without merit ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief and amended supplemental pro se brief, are also without merit.