AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM STEWART, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal ( see People v. Saunders, 19 AD3d 744; People v. Ciatto, 290 AD2d 560; People v. Walsh, 243 AD2d 590). Although the waiver did not preclude review of the defendant's claim that his plea was not voluntarily or knowingly made, this claim is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground ( see People v. Hussain, 309 AD2d 818; People v. Harrell, 288 AD2d 489; People v. Sierra, 256 AD2d 598).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. STEWART
(Jun 20, 2006)