DAYAN v. YURKOWSKI

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

2004-10703.

Attorney(S)

Neiman Ginsburg Mairanz, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Marvin Neiman and Teodore T. Mairanz of counsel), for appellant. Engel Gustin, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Mona C. Engel of counsel), for respondents.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

DAYAN v. YURKOWSKI

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jun 20, 2006

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

2004-10703.

Attorney(S)

Neiman Ginsburg Mairanz, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Marvin Neiman and Teodore T. Mairanz of counsel), for appellant. Engel Gustin, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Mona C. Engel of counsel), for respondents.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

NAIMA DAYAN et al., Respondents, v. JOSEPH YURKOWSKI, Also Known as JOSEPH YORK, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly entered judgment based on its order confirming the determination of the Judicial Hearing Officer since the findings contained in the Judicial Hearing Officer's report were supported by the record ( see Mondello v. Mondello, 253 AD2d 861; Namer v. 152-54-56 W. 15th St. Realty Corp., 108 AD2d 705).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

NAIMA DAYAN et al., Respondents, v. JOSEPH YURKOWSKI, Also Known as JOSEPH YORK, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.).

Comments