Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conser v. torship of Da

Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] David B. Johnson appeals from an order appointing his children, Carrie E. Johnson and David S. Johnson, as co-guardians and co-conservators of his estate with no limitations on their authority to make decisions for him. David B. Johnson argues the district court failed to consider the least restrictive form of intervention under N.D.C.C. § 30.1-28-04 and the court's grant of unlimited authority to the co-guardians violated David B. Johnson's right to decide his place of residence. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7) and In re Guardianship/Conservatorship of Van Sickle, 2005 ND 69, ¶¶ 30-35, 694 N.W.2d 212 and In re Guardianship of Braaten, 502 N.W.2d 512, 517-23 (N.D. 1993).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Douglas L. Mattson, D.J.

Bruce E. Bohlman, S.J.

[¶ 3] The Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, D.J., and The Honorable Bruce E. Bohlman, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., and Sandstrom, J., disqualified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN MATTER OF GUARDIANSHIP OF JOHNSON
(Jul 5, 2006)