Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

CASINO ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, BALLY'SPARK PLACE, INC. T/A BALLY'S HOTEL CASINO, BALLY'S WILD WEST CASINO ANDCLARIDGE CASINO; BOARDWALK REGENCY CORPORATION T/A CAESARS ATLANTIC CITY;RIH ACQUISITIONS NJ, LLC T/A ATLANTIC CITY HILTON; TRUMP TAJ MAHAL CASINORESORT; TRUMP MARINA ASSOCIATES, LLC T/A TRUMP MARINA HOTEL CASINO; TRUMPPLAZA ASSOCIATES, LLC T/A TRUMP PLAZA HOTEL AND CASINO; ADAMAR OF NEWJERSEY, INC. T/A TROPICANA CASINO RESORT; MARINA ASSOCIATES T/AHARRAH'S CASINO HOTEL; ATLANTIC CITY SHOWBOAT, INC. T/A SHOWBOAT HOTELCASINO; RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC. T/A RESORTS ATLANTIC CITY; MARINADISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC D/B/A BORGATA HOTEL CASINO SPA; ANDACE GAMING, LLC D/B/A SANDS HOTEL AND CASINO; PLAINTIFFS-MOVANTS, v. CASINOCONTROL COMMISSION; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; THENEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF GAMINGENFORCEMENT; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; JON CORZINE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OFNEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

JAMES R. ZAZZALI, Associate Justice.

The within matter having been initiated by the Casino Association of New Jersey, which filed a motion with this Court pursuant to Rule 2:9-8 seeking emergent relief in the form of a single-Justice order for temporary restraints and an issuance of a writ in lieu of mandamus to respondents Governor Corzine and the Casino Control Commission;

And the movants having argued that the loss or suspension of the use of a casino license for even a short period of time would inflict devastating harm on the gaming industry, the State, and its citizens and would constitute an unconstitutional taking;

And respondents having answered that relief is precluded by the separation of powers doctrine and that movants are not otherwise entitled to the relief requested;

And the Appellate Division previously having denied relief to movants pending disposition of the appeal in that court;

And the Court having carefully reviewed the submissions of the parties;

And the Court having heard oral argument today, July 3, 2006, and having given due consideration to the arguments of counsel;

And the Court being satisfied that movants have not established sufficient grounds for relief;

It is on this 3rd day of July, 2006, ORDERED that the motion for emergent relief is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CASINO ASS'N v. CASINO CONTROL
(Jul 3, 2006)