Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in placing the appellant on probation for a period of 12 months ( see Family Ct Act § 352.2 [b]; Matter of William K., 14 AD3d 513). Based upon the nature of the crime, the recommendation in the probation report, the appellant's excessive absences at school, as well as her poor academic performance, the Family Court properly found that the "least restrictive [dispositional] alternative" was probation supervision ( see Family Ct Act § 352.2 [a]; Matter of Leah G., 23 AD3d 658).