AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

In the Matter of ROBERT PASIEKA, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant.

Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision ( see Schicchi v J.A. Green Constr, Corp., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, the cross motion is granted, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellant. Because the petitioner opted to pursue an administrative appeal of the determination of the New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the TA) to the New York City Civil Service Commission (hereinafter the CSC), the proceeding against the TA was barred by Civil Service Law § 76 ( see Civil Service Law § 76, [3]; Matter of Turner v New York City Tr. Auth., 252 AD2d 558; Matter of Wood v Cosgrove, 237 AD2d 616).

Furthermore, the Supreme Court erred in determining that the TA and the CSC were "mutual agents" of each other, and that the proceeding was therefore timely commenced. In any event, the petitioner failed to establish that the CSC's decision was in excess of its authority or in violation of the Constitution or the laws of this State ( see Matter of New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn., 78 NY2d 318, 324; Matter of Turner v New York City Tr. Auth., supra).

In view of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties' remaining contentions.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PASIEKA v. N.Y
(Jul 25, 2006)