MAYO v. RESEARCH ANALYSIS MAINTENANCE, INC. (W.D.La. 7-26-2006)

DEE DRELL, District Judge

Pursuant to the Memorandum Ruling of this date,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Research Analysis and Maintenance, Inc. against Sara Mayo (doc. #30) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion to dismiss Sara's claim of sexual harassment is hereby GRANTED and said claim is dismissed with prejudice; the motion to dismiss Sara's claims of retaliation is DENIED. The motion for summary judgment filed by RAM against Regina Wade (doc. # 32) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion to dismiss Regina's claim of sexual harassment is hereby GRANTED and said claim is dismissed with prejudice; the motion to dismiss Regina's claims of retaliation is hereby DENIED; the motion to dismiss Regina's gender discrimination claim is hereby GRANTED and said claim is dismissed with prejudice. The motion for summary judgment filed by RAM against Adana Mayo (doc. #34) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion to dismiss Adana's claim of sexual harassment is hereby GRANTED and said claim is dismissed with prejudice; the motion to dismiss the claim of retaliation is hereby DENIED; and the motion to dismiss Adana's failure to promote claim is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Court has determined there is no just reason for delay and hereby directs entry of final judgment under rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers at Alexandria, Louisiana.