DAVID CERCONE, District Judge
On October 17, 2005, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b) (1) (A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
On July 25, 2006, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Document No. 13) recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 6) be granted regarding the Plaintiff's PHRA claim, but denied regarding her ADA claim.
Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties, and no objections have been filed. After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:
AND NOW, on this 17 th day of August, 2006, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 6) is GRANTED regarding the Plaintiff's PHRA claim, and DENIED regarding Plaintiff's ADA claim.
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza dated July 25, 2006, is hereby adopted as the opinion of the District Court.