AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BARBARA CLARK, Defendant.

ORDER

FRANK DAMRELL JR., District Judge

On July 7, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 7, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Placer.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM v. CLARK
(Sep 1, 2006)