AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

RAYMOND H. NEAEY, SR., et al., Respondents, v. TOWER INSURANCE et al., Defendants, and LINCOLN BROKERAGE CORP., Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the action was not time-barred. The causes of action accrued and the relevant statutes of limitations began to run on August 5, 2002, the date the Tower Insurance policy at issue was procured and issued ( see St. George Hotel Assoc, v Shurkin, 12 AD3d 359, 360). Contrary to the appellant's contention that the same error constituting the alleged breach of contract may have been made earlier in connection with its procurement of coverage from a different insurer does not result in an earlier accrual date for the instant causes of action relating to the Tower Insurance policy ( see Vic Char Realty, Inc. v Alliance Plus, Inc., 26 AD3d 278; cf. Mauro v Niemann Agency, 303 AD2d 468).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEARY v. TOWN.INS
(Sep 19, 2006)