AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL KUBALA et al., Appellants, v. LOUBERT SUDDABY, M.D., Respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict of no cause of action, dismissing the complaint in this medical malpractice action. We reject the contention of plaintiffs that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence. "[T]he preponderance of the evidence in favor of plaintiffs] is not so great that the verdict could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence, nor is the verdict [finding that defendant was not negligent] palpably wrong or irrational" ( Kettles v City of Rochester, 21 AD3d 1424, 1425; see generally Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KUBLA v. SUDDABY
(Sep 22, 2006)