Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JAMIME PERALES FLORES, Plaintiff, v. WALLA WALLA POLICE, Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING ACTION

FRED VAN SICKLE, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Leavitt Imbrogno filed a Report and Recommendation on August 29, 2006, recommending Mr. Perales Flores's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the action dismissed as Plaintiff's allegations were legally frivolous. See O'Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir. 1990); Tripati v. First Nat'l Bank Trust, 821 F.2d 1368, 1369-70 (9th Cir. 1987) ("A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.").

Nothing in federal law precludes local law enforcement officials from arresting individuals for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. There being no objections, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The Application to Proceed in forma pauperis (Ct. Rec. 2) is DENIED and the action is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, enter judgment, forward a copy to Plaintiff at his last known address and close the file.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FLORES v. WALLA WALLA POLICE
(Oct 2, 2006)