AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CLAUDIA GROSSO et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE OF IRA L. GERSHENSON et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff could not bring an action against the decedent's estate since no executor or administrator had been appointed. "An estate is not a legal entity and any action for or against the estate must be by or against the executor or administrator in his or her representative capacity" ( 100 W. 72nd St. Assoc. v Murphy, 144 Misc 2d 1036, 1040). Since no executor or administrator had been appointed for the decedent's estate, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the estate ( see Jordan v City of New York, 23 AD3d 436). Further, the defendant Deborah Radice could not be sued as executor of the estate since she had never been appointed executor.

The plaintiff's claim that there is a basis for in personam jurisdiction over the defendant Deborah Radice under the provisions of SCPA 210 (2) is without merit. SCPA 210 (2) is not applicable in this case because Radice did not receive or accept property paid or distributed from an estate ( see Matter of Roy, 166 AD2d 146).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GROSSO v. GERSHENSON
(Oct 3, 2006)